Sample Rate Converter
Compare audio sample rates — 8 kHz telephone, 44.1 kHz CD, 48 kHz video, 96/192 kHz hi-res, 384 kHz ultra hi-end. Shows Nyquist frequency, aliasing threshold, data rate, and PCM file-size estimates for any duration, bit depth, and channel count.
Input
Result
Common Audio Sample Rates Compared
| Sample Rate | Nyquist | 16-bit Stereo Data Rate | 1 min file size | Typical Use |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8 kHz | 4 kHz | 32 KB/s | ~1.9 MB | Landline telephone |
| 11.025 kHz | 5.5 kHz | 44.1 KB/s | ~2.6 MB | Low-quality voice |
| 16 kHz | 8 kHz | 64 KB/s | ~3.8 MB | Wideband VoIP, AMR-WB |
| 22.05 kHz | 11.025 kHz | 88.2 KB/s | ~5.3 MB | Low-fi audio, old games |
| 32 kHz | 16 kHz | 128 KB/s | ~7.7 MB | FM radio quality |
| 44.1 kHz | 22.05 kHz | 176.4 KB/s | ~10.6 MB | CD Audio standard |
| 48 kHz | 24 kHz | 192 KB/s | ~11.5 MB | DVD, broadcast, pro video |
| 88.2 kHz | 44.1 kHz | 352.8 KB/s | ~21.2 MB | Hi-res audio (2× CD) |
| 96 kHz | 48 kHz | 384 KB/s | ~23.0 MB | DVD-Audio, professional |
| 176.4 kHz | 88.2 kHz | 705.6 KB/s | ~42.3 MB | Hi-res audio (4× CD) |
| 192 kHz | 96 kHz | 768 KB/s | ~46.1 MB | Blu-ray, studio mastering |
| 352.8 kHz | 176.4 kHz | 1.41 MB/s | ~84.7 MB | DXD mastering format |
| 384 kHz | 192 kHz | 1.54 MB/s | ~92.2 MB | Ultra hi-end audio |
About Sample Rates, Nyquist & Aliasing
Sample rate is how many times per second an audio signal is measured during analog-to-digital conversion (ADC). This audio sample rate calculator and sample rate converter lets you compare rates side by side, estimate PCM file sizes, and understand the Nyquist implications of any choice. Nyquist frequency is half the sample rate — by the Nyquist-Shannon sampling theorem, that's the highest signal frequency that can be perfectly reconstructed from discrete samples. Any frequency above Nyquist will "fold back" into the audible range as a different, spurious frequency — this artifact is called aliasing. Real-world converters prevent it with a steep low-pass anti-aliasing filter placed before the ADC stage. To understand how a sample period relates to frequency in general, the frequency-to-period converter illustrates the same reciprocal relationship.
Why 44.1 kHz for CDs?
Human hearing tops out around 20 kHz. A 44.1 kHz sample rate provides a 22.05 kHz Nyquist, leaving a ~2 kHz "guard band" for the anti-aliasing filter to roll off before reaching the hearing limit. The specific 44.1 number comes from early Sony PCM adapter designs that recorded audio onto video-tape — three audio samples fit per video line at NTSC (60 Hz × 245 lines × 3 = 44,100).
48 kHz vs 44.1 kHz
48 kHz is the standard for video, broadcast, and most professional audio (AES3, SMPTE). 44.1 kHz is the standard for music CDs and consumer audio downloads. Sample rate conversion (SRC) between them is lossy because the ratio 44100:48000 = 147:160 is irrational in audio terms, so professional workflows pick one and stick to it. Modern DAWs handle the conversion transparently, though quality varies between implementations.
Hi-res audio: 96 kHz / 192 kHz
Sample rates above 48 kHz are mostly used for production headroom (filters, time-stretching, pitch-shifting work better with more samples) and for oversampling in plugin processing to push aliasing artefacts above the audible band. Whether 96 kHz delivery audibly improves over 44.1 kHz remains controversial — most double-blind ABX listening tests don't find a statistically significant difference for well-recorded material. The file sizes triple or quadruple, and DAW CPU load increases proportionally.
File size impact
Uncompressed PCM file size grows linearly with sample rate, bit depth, and channel count: bytes/sec = SR × bits/8 × channels. The PCM bitrate for stereo 16-bit CD audio (44.1 kHz) is 1,411 kbps; hi-res audio at 24-bit / 96 kHz stereo runs to 4,608 kbps, making hi-res audio file sizes nearly 3.5× larger per minute (~34.5 MB vs ~10 MB). Lossless compression (FLAC, ALAC) reduces these by roughly 50–60% without any quality loss; lossy codecs (AAC, Opus, MP3) reduce them further with perceptual coding trade-offs.